2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 605 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 6 | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |
