2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (300 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (207 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 6 | Vision |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |
