2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2005 Scion xB
To start off, 2005 Scion xB is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Scion xB (108 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 259 kg more than 2005 Scion xB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2005 Scion xB | |
| Make | Mazda | Scion |
| Model | 6 | xB |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1086 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
