2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2006 Holden Captiva
To start off, 2006 Holden Captiva is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,899 cc, 2006 Holden Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Captiva (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2006 Holden Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Captiva (542 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2006 Holden Captiva | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1899 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
