2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2006 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2006 Renault Laguna is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,869 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Laguna (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Laguna (270 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2006 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Laguna |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1869 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 10.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |