2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2006 Rover 45
To start off, 2006 Rover 45 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Rover 45 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Rover 45. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2006 Rover 45. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 240 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2006 Rover 45 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 45 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 10.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1305 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |