2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour

To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (125 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda 6 2006 Smart ForFour
Make Mazda Smart
Model 6 ForFour
Year Released 2003 2006
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1594 cc 1332 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 104 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 125 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline - Premium
Acceleration 0-100mph 11 seconds 10.8 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1345 kg 970 kg
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.2 L/100km 5.8 L/100km