2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2007 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2007 Subaru Forester is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Subaru Forester (224 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2007 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Subaru Forester (307 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2007 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | 6 | Forester |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 307 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |