2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2008 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2008 Saab 9-7X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Saab 9-7X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Saab 9-7X (300 HP) has 196 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Saab 9-7X should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2008 Saab 9-7X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saab 9-7X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Saab 9-7X (435 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Saab 9-7X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2008 Saab 9-7X | |
| Make | Mazda | Saab |
| Model | 6 | 9-7X |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 5328 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 435 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
