2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2009 Volvo S80
To start off, 2009 Volvo S80 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,412 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S80 (311 HP @ 5950 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2009 Volvo S80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S80 (441 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2009 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | S80 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 4412 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5950 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 441 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |