2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (159 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 213 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac DTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (205 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2010 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 6 | DTS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2936 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |