2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo

To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 55 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Bravo.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda 6 2010 Fiat Bravo
Make Mazda Fiat
Model 6 Bravo
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1989 cc 1747 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 139 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 181 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Top Speed 206 km/hour 191 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.9 seconds 10.3 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 1435 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 58 L