2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2010 Kia Carnival is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Carnival (186 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Carnival weights approximately 679 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Carnival (246 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2010 Kia Carnival | |
| Make | Mazda | Kia |
| Model | 6 | Carnival |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 186 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 246 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2024 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
