2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Ford F-350
To start off, 2011 Ford F-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2011 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2011 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | F-350 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 548 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3967 mm |