2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (165 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | UTE |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
