2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Leaf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 6 | Leaf |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.2 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.2 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
