2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (144 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 6 | RCZ |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1359 mm |