2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (115 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 6 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 46 L |