2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Barina. (197 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda 6 | 2012 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | Barina |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
