2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2012 Honda Jazz is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2012 Honda Jazz. (118 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Jazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Jazz. (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2012 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 6 | Jazz |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 42 L |