2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Mazda 5
To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 5 (113 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 5 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 5. (165 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2012 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 6 | 5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 165 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 12.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2751 mm |