2003 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Toyota Avensis
To start off, 2012 Toyota Avensis is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Avensis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Avensis (145 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Avensis should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Avensis weights approximately 39 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Avensis. (197 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Avensis.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 6 | 2012 Toyota Avensis | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Avensis |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 197 Nm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 11.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1384 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |