2003 Mazda Kusabi vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Kusabi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Kusabi would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Proton Gen-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Proton Gen-2 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 0 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Kusabi. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Kusabi.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Kusabi (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Kusabi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Kusabi | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | Kusabi | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1559 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |