2003 Mazda MPV vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2003 Mazda MPV is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 Mazda MPV.
Because 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda MPV | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | MPV | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3130 mm |
