2003 Mazda MPV vs. 1966 Steyr 650T

To start off, 2003 Mazda MPV is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda MPV (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1966 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda MPV weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1966 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda MPV (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr 650T.

Compare all specifications: