2003 Mazda MPV vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Mazda MPV. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda MPV. (230 Nm). This means 2007 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda MPV. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda MPV has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda MPV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda MPV | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
| Model | MPV | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
