2003 Mazda Premacy vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Premacy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Premacy would be higher. At 1,969 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Premacy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Premacy (124 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Premacy should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 141 kg more than 2003 Mazda Premacy.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Premacy | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Premacy | C30 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 60 L |