2003 Mazda Premacy vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Premacy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Premacy would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Premacy weights approximately 125 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Premacy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Premacy (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Premacy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Premacy | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | Premacy | Cooper |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 50 L |