2003 Mazda Roadster vs. 1964 MG MGC

To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (148 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (167 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1964 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster. 2003 Mazda Roadster has automatic transmission and 1964 MG MGC has manual transmission. 1964 MG MGC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: