2003 Mazda Roadster vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (157 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 170 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Roadster | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Roadster | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2530 mm |