2003 Mazda Roadster vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Roadster would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 75 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Roadster (170 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Roadster | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Roadster | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |