2003 Mazda Roadster vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota

To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Roadster would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda Roadster 2010 Dodge Dakota
Make Mazda Dodge
Model Roadster Dakota
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 3701 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 123 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 142 Nm 236 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 87.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.6 mm 100 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 3960 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2270 mm 3340 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 83 L