2003 Mazda Roadster vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Roadster would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (123 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Note weights approximately 22 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Roadster | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Roadster | Note |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2600 mm |