2003 Mazda Roadster vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Roadster would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (157 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (170 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda Roadster has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Roadster | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | Roadster | CR-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 58 L |