2003 Mazda Roadster vs. 2012 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 207 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Roadster would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 207 (152 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Roadster | 2012 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | Roadster | 207 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 152 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1972 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1397 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |