2003 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1996 Fiat Siena

To start off, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 1996 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1996 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Siena.

Compare all specifications: