2003 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2004 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2004 Peugeot 607 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,230 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2004 Peugeot 607. (156 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Peugeot 607. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Peugeot 607 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2003 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 607, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Peugeot 607 (217 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2004 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda RX-8 | 2004 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | RX-8 | 607 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2230 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |