2003 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda RX-8 | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | RX-8 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 211 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |