2003 Mazda Tribute vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 354 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda Tribute | 1955 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Mazda | Riley |
| Model | Tribute | RM A |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1236 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2870 mm |
