2003 Mazda Tribute vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Tribute (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (179 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda Tribute | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Tribute | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
