2003 Mazda Tribute vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 651 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Tribute | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | Tribute | 102 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2160 mm |