2003 Mazda Tribute vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx

To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 545 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Tribute (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (122 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.

Compare all specifications: