2003 Mazda Tribute vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Tribute. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 520 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Suzuki Equator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Tribute. (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda Tribute 2012 Suzuki Equator
Make Mazda Suzuki
Model Tribute Equator
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 122 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 230 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1495 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1720 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.7 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]