2003 Mazda Washu vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2003 Mazda Washu is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 684 kg more than 2003 Mazda Washu.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Washu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda Washu | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Washu | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 81 L |
