2003 Mazda Washu vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Mazda Washu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Washu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Washu (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Washu should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Washu weights approximately 476 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Washu (283 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Washu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Washu | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Washu | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 283 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 57 L |