2003 Mazda Washu vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2003 Mazda Washu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Pontiac Firebird (285 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Washu. (238 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Washu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 244 kg more than 2003 Mazda Washu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Washu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda Washu | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | Washu | Firebird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 285 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2750 mm |