2003 Mazda Washu vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Washu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Washu would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Washu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Washu (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Washu should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Washu. (283 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Washu.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mazda Washu | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
| Model | Washu | Stavic |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 283 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |
