2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 1953 Morris Minor
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Morris Minor would be higher. At 918 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Morris Minor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1953 Morris Minor. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1953 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Morris Minor weights approximately 50 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Morris Minor. (53 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Crossblade | 1953 Morris Minor | |
| Make | MCC | Morris |
| Model | Crossblade | Minor |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 918 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2190 mm |
