2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 1961 Skoda Felicia
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Skoda Felicia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Skoda Felicia would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Skoda Felicia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1961 Skoda Felicia. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1961 Skoda Felicia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Skoda Felicia weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Skoda Felicia. (86 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Skoda Felicia.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Crossblade | 1961 Skoda Felicia | |
Make | MCC | Skoda |
Model | Crossblade | Felicia |
Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
Engine Size | 598 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 86 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2400 mm |