2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 1991 Nissan Micra

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 988 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1991 Nissan Micra. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1991 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 75 kg more than 1991 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Nissan Micra. (73 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Nissan Micra.

Compare all specifications: